Continuum Health Partners: Beth IsraelRoosevelt Hospital and St. Luke's HospitalLong Island College HospitalNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary
     HomeFind A DoctorContact Us Print

Title: A Phase I/II Study Of Partial Breast Brachytherapy In Patients Who Have Previously Received External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT) To The Breast.
Author(s):

Manjeet Chadha,1 M.D., Sheldon Feldman, 2 M.D., Louis B Harrison., 1 M.D.
Department of Radiation Oncology 1 and Department of Surgery 2, Beth Israel Medical Center. New York. N.Y. 10003

Purpose: Mastectomy is the most widely accepted treatment for managing local recurrence or new breast cancer in patients who have previously received RT to the breast. With accumulating evidence supporting partial breast irradiation, we embarked on a Phase I/II study to evaluate the role of brachytherapy for patients presenting with either a local breast recurrence after lumpectomy and RT or a new breast cancer diagnosed in women who had previously received mantle irradiation.
Materials & Methods: In consideration of the history of prior RT and the lack of established safety of re-treatment, the protocol permitted only interstitial low dose-rate brachytherapy. For patients with locally recurrent breast cancer, the protocol design included a dose escalation regimen: the first 6 patients received 30Gy. After a minimum follow up period of 12 months, which confirmed no unacceptable acute toxicity in the treated breast, the total brachytherapy dose was increased to 45Gy. All patients with prior mantle irradiation received 45Gy. Eligibility included all histologic subtypes presenting as a unifocal lesion. All patients underwent a lumpectomy with negative microscopically-assessed surgical margins prior to brachytherapy. Systemic therapy, when recommended started after a minimum 2- week interval following removal of brachytherapy catheters. From 1999 to present, 17 patients have completed treatment. Fourteen patients had prior RT for breast cancer, 2 for Hodgkin’s disease and 1 for Non Hodgkin’s lymphoma. At the time of brachytherapy, 13 patients had an infiltrating cancer and 4 patients had DCIS. The median tumor size was 0.8cm (0.4cm to 1.5cm). The median number of interstitial catheters used was 11. Brachytherapy was delivered at a dose rate 40-50 cGy/hour. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics. Three patients have received systemic chemotherapy and 2 patients are on hormones. All patients have been followed by the multidisciplinary team.
Results: The median time from the initial RT to the current brachytherapy is 91.8 mo (range 28.5mo to 321.3mo). The median follow up after brachytherapy is 30.6 mo (range: 9mo to 81mo). No patients developed an infection. No skin toxicity > RTOG grade 2 was observed. No excessive fibrosis or necrosis has been observed. Most patients with prior history of breast cancer were noted to have asymmetry in breast size as a result of the second lumpectomy performed prior to brachytherapy. This factor influenced the number of catheters placed at the lumpectomy site. With breast asymmetry as a given, the cosmetic result observed in all patients has been good to excellent. One patient developed a local breast recurrence at 27 months following brachytherapy she underwent a salvage mastectomy and remains free of disease. The 3-year Kaplan Meier analysis of breast conservation rate and local disease-free survival following brachytherapy is 89%. The overall survival is 93%.
Conclusion: The preliminary experience using brachytherapy ina previously irradiated breast suggests low complication rates, and acceptable cosmetic results. The relatively high local control rates and freedom from mastectomy for local recurrence warrants further investigation to establish brachytherapy as an acceptable alternative to mastectomy for selected patients.